The Lindsay Clancy trial and the Conwell 7 has brought to life, in the most exaggerated and cartoonish way possible, the growing divide between feminist ideology and consequential knowledge. It’s a grotesque exaggerated performance echoing the #MeToo movement which has only revealed the dangerous ignorance of women in general and their feminazi desire to catapult all justice, logic, and life out the window for the sake of feeling “powerful” which ultimately destroys the real powers women have.
The reality is these women understand nothing about the real world. They’re lost in their own delusions, spending hours per day in echo chambers of people saying opinions are new fact and old facts are someone else’s reality. They’ve been educated enough to feel smart but not educated enough to understand they’ve only been taught gibberish. But when you feel smart, you’re more than ready to insert yourself in someone else’s life and made decisions for them, even when they understand nothing at all. In fact, these types of women are guided by the feminazi urge to make everything fall under the political umbrella so they can control as possible and use the term “social justice” to justify controlling things they have no real consequential knowledge of.
Modern philosophers have discussed the issue to death for almost two years, but the reality is this phenomenon is much older. The term suicidal empathy, coined by Gad Saad in his book of the same name, also known as False Compassion, coined by Archbishop Fulton Sheen, is the willingness to show compassion or empathy to an obvious enemy by completely disregarding common sense and self-preservation to side with a perpetrator instead of the victim. It comes from a much older concept discussed but not clearly named in Thomas Sowell’s Social Justice Fallacies from the original progressives in the late 19th century. When someone believes they are an expert in a field, they start preempting decision makers in areas which these experts have no consequential knowledge of and which they refuse to recognize as their own short comings.
In quadrants of knowledge terms, these women have stopped believing there’s anything out there in their unknowns-unknowns—a dangerous and arrogant mindset that doesn’t just apply to them but all knowledge elites in the progressive and academic sphere. The self-correcting mechanisms of real life do not apply to them. The consequences of their actions never come back to bite them, and so they can speak about everything, change the world, and continue to live safe from any negative consequences. Unfortunately, these social justice warriors are always the loudest people in the room and their opponents are labeled the ignorant istophobic third-party who can be safely ignored.
It was only a matter of time before enough of these activists put their foot in their mouth to lead to a countercultural response. Now we have people saying we should repeal the 19th, which is widely being played off as a joke despite multiple people taking the idea very seriously. As they say, pride goeth before the fall, and we’re long overdue for a reality check.
Leave a comment